Why Measuring Program Objectives Is Important in an Outcome Evaluations Peer Review

Many types of evaluation exist, consequently evaluation methods need to be customised according to what is existence evaluated and the purpose of the evaluation.one,2 It is important to understand the different types of evaluation that tin can be conducted over a plan's life-cycle and when they should be used. The primary types of evaluation are process, impact, outcome and summative evaluation.1

Before y'all are able to mensurate the effectiveness of your project, you need to determine if the project is being run as intended and if it is reaching the intended audition.3 It is futile to try and decide how constructive your program is if you are not sure of the objective, structure, programing and audience of the project. This is why process evaluation should be washed prior to any other type of evaluation.3

Process evaluation

Process evaluation is used to "measure the activities of the program, program quality and who it is reaching"3 Process evaluation, as outlined by Hawe and colleagues3 volition help respond questions nigh your programme such as:

  • Has the project reached the target group?
  • Are all project activities reaching all parts of the target group?
  • Are participants and other key stakeholders satisfied with all aspects of the projection?
  • Are all activities existence implemented as intended? If not why?
  • What if whatever changes have been made to intended activities?
  • Are all materials, information and presentations suitable for the target audience?

Impact evaluation

Impact evaluation is used to mensurate the immediate outcome of the plan and is aligned with the programs objectives. Impact evaluation measures how well the programs objectives (and sub-objectives) have been achieved.one,iii

Impact evaluation will assist reply questions such as:

  • How well has the project achieved its objectives (and sub-objectives)?
  • How well take the desired short term changes been achieved?

For example, ane of the objectives of the My-Peer project is to provide a safe space and learning environment for immature people, without fearfulness of judgment, misunderstanding, harassment or abuse. Impact evaluation will assess the attitudes of young people towards the learning environment and how they perceived it. It may besides appraise changes in participants' self esteem, confidence and social connectedness.

Impact evaluation measures the program effectiveness immediate after the completion of the plan and up to 6 months after the completion of the programme.

Issue evaluation

Outcome evaluation is concerned with the long term furnishings of the program and is generally used to mensurate the programme goal. Consequently, upshot evaluation measures how well the program goal has been achieved.ane,3

Event evaluation will help respond questions such as:

  • Has the overall program goal been achieved?
  • What, if any factors exterior the plan have contributed or hindered the desired change?
  • What, if whatsoever unintended change has occurred as a result of the program?

In peer-based youth programs outcome evaluation may measure out changes to: mental and physical wellbeing, didactics and employment and help-seeking behaviours.

Outcome evaluation measures changes at least half-dozen months after the implementation of the programme (longer term). Although consequence evaluation measures the main goal of the plan, it tin can too be used to assess program objectives over time. Information technology should be noted that it is not always possible or appropriate to bear result evaluation in peer-based programs.

Summative evaluation

At the completion of the program it may likewise be valuable to conduct summative evaluation. This considers the entire plan bicycle and assists in decisions such every bit:

  • Do you continue the plan?
  • If so, do you lot continue it in its entirety?
  • Is it possible to implement the program in other settings?
  • How sustainable is the program?
  • What elements could take helped or hindered the plan?
  • What recommendations have evolved out of the program?3,4

References

  1. Nutbeam & Bauman 2006
  2. Trochim 2006
  3. Hawe, P., Degeling, D., Hall, J. (1990) Evaluating Health Promotion: A Health Worker's Guide, MacLennan & Petty, Sydney.
  4. Southward Australian Customs Wellness Research Unit n.d.c

westshemord59.blogspot.com

Source: https://mypeer.org.au/monitoring-evaluation/types-of-evaluation/

0 Response to "Why Measuring Program Objectives Is Important in an Outcome Evaluations Peer Review"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel